†Carlocebus carmenensis
Carlocebus carmenensis ist eine Primatenart, die ab dem Neogen (Miozän) im Burdigalium lebte, das vor rund 20,4 Millionen Jahren begann und bis vor 16 Millionen Jahren andauerte.
Fundorte
Die Funddaten, die Systematik sowie die unten folgende Literatursammlung stammen aus der Paleobiology Database, Lizenz
Daten zu den einzelnen Funden von Carlocebus carmenensis
| Sammlung | Epoche, Alter | Geologie, Formation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portezuelo Sumich Norte, Pinturas Fm., Lago Buenos Aires | Burdigalian zwischen 15.97 und 20.44 Millionen Jahren |
Pinturas | ||
| Kommentar z. Stratigraphie | Lithographie | Museum | ||
| Pertains to "Middle Sequence" = "Pinturan" of Kramarz & Bellosi 2005 Brandoni et al 2016: The absolute ages of ca. 17.99 Ma near the base of the Pinturas Formation at Estancia el Carmen (47? 120 44.6400S, 70? 340 9700W), and ca. 16.8 Ma in the Santa Cruz For- mation that overlies the Pinturas Formation at Portezuelo Sumich Norte (see Perkins et al. 2012 and Fleagle et al. 2012) (Fig. 1b) indicate that the lower and middle sequences from the Pinturas Formation would be similar in age to those from the coastal localities of the Santa Cruz Formation (‘‘typical Santacrucian fauna’’) with ages of ca. 18–16 Ma (Bown and Fleagle 1993; Fleagle et al. 1995; Tejedor et al. 2006; Perkins et al. 2012), and younger than those from the lower Fossil Zone of the Colhue-Huapi Member of the Sarmiento Formation (‘‘Colhuehuapian fauna’’) (Kramarz et al. 2010) with ages of ca. 20.4–20.0 Ma (Re´ et al. 2010) or 21.11–18.62 Ma (Dunn et al. 2013) (Fig. 2) Brandoni et al 2016: In the locality of Portezuelo Sumich Norte (46? 570 33.0900S, 70? 400 200W; Fig. 1a, b), numerous fossil remains (including primates) come from opposite sides of a badland ridge that probably preserves a part of the base of the middle sequence that has filled a scour cur into the top of the lower sequence (Bown and Larriestra 1990 fig. 9a; T. Bown, Pers. Com). There is an absolute age of ca. 16.8 Ma from a tuff of the Santa Cruz Formation that lies uncon- formably over the top of the Pinturas sequence (Bown and Larriestra 1990; Perkins et al. 2012; Fleagle et al. 2012); | Brandoni et al 2016: The Pinturas Formation is composed of up to 100 m of Miocene continental pyroclastic and eolian epiclastic sed-iments outcropping in the upper valley of the Pinturas River and its tributaries (Fig. 1a). It lies unconformably atop the Jurassic La Matilde Formation (Bahı´a Laura River and its tributaries (Fig. 1a). It lies unconformably atop the Jurassic La Matilde Formation (Bahı´a Laura Group), and is divided by two intraformational erosional unconformities into three sequences: (a) the lower sequence, dominated by pyroclastic mudrocks upon which very mature paleosols were formed; (b) the middle sequence, composed largely by epiclastic sand occurring as barchanoid paleodunes; and (c) the upper sequence, con-sisting of massive, poorly bedded pyroclastic mudrocks (Bown et al. 1988; Bown and Larriestra 1990). The Pin-turas Formation differs from the Santa Cruz Formation in the greater volume of pyroclastic materials, absence of marine intercalations, and the presence of mature paleosols in the lower sequence (Bown and Larriestra 1990). | MACN | ||
| U.a. am Fundort ausgegraben: | Soriacebus ameghinorum | |||
| Sammlung | Epoche, Alter | Geologie, Formation |
|---|---|---|
| El Carmen Lower, Pinturas Fm., Lago Buenos Aires, Santa Cruz | Burdigalian zwischen 15.97 und 20.44 Millionen Jahren |
Pinturas |
| Kommentar z. Stratigraphie | Museum | |
| Pertains to "Lower Sequence" = "Pinturan" of Kramaz and Bellosi, 2005 | MACN |
| Sammlung | Epoche, Alter | Geologie, Formation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portezuelo Sumich Norte, Pinturas Fm., Lago Buenos Aires | Burdigalian zwischen 15.97 und 20.44 Millionen Jahren |
Pinturas | ||
| Kommentar z. Stratigraphie | Lithographie | Museum | ||
| Pertains to "Middle Sequence" = "Pinturan" of Kramarz & Bellosi 2005 Brandoni et al 2016: The absolute ages of ca. 17.99 Ma near the base of the Pinturas Formation at Estancia el Carmen (47? 120 44.6400S, 70? 340 9700W), and ca. 16.8 Ma in the Santa Cruz For- mation that overlies the Pinturas Formation at Portezuelo Sumich Norte (see Perkins et al. 2012 and Fleagle et al. 2012) (Fig. 1b) indicate that the lower and middle sequences from the Pinturas Formation would be similar in age to those from the coastal localities of the Santa Cruz Formation (‘‘typical Santacrucian fauna’’) with ages of ca. 18–16 Ma (Bown and Fleagle 1993; Fleagle et al. 1995; Tejedor et al. 2006; Perkins et al. 2012), and younger than those from the lower Fossil Zone of the Colhue-Huapi Member of the Sarmiento Formation (‘‘Colhuehuapian fauna’’) (Kramarz et al. 2010) with ages of ca. 20.4–20.0 Ma (Re´ et al. 2010) or 21.11–18.62 Ma (Dunn et al. 2013) (Fig. 2) Brandoni et al 2016: In the locality of Portezuelo Sumich Norte (46? 570 33.0900S, 70? 400 200W; Fig. 1a, b), numerous fossil remains (including primates) come from opposite sides of a badland ridge that probably preserves a part of the base of the middle sequence that has filled a scour cur into the top of the lower sequence (Bown and Larriestra 1990 fig. 9a; T. Bown, Pers. Com). There is an absolute age of ca. 16.8 Ma from a tuff of the Santa Cruz Formation that lies uncon- formably over the top of the Pinturas sequence (Bown and Larriestra 1990; Perkins et al. 2012; Fleagle et al. 2012); | Brandoni et al 2016: The Pinturas Formation is composed of up to 100 m of Miocene continental pyroclastic and eolian epiclastic sed-iments outcropping in the upper valley of the Pinturas River and its tributaries (Fig. 1a). It lies unconformably atop the Jurassic La Matilde Formation (Bahı´a Laura River and its tributaries (Fig. 1a). It lies unconformably atop the Jurassic La Matilde Formation (Bahı´a Laura Group), and is divided by two intraformational erosional unconformities into three sequences: (a) the lower sequence, dominated by pyroclastic mudrocks upon which very mature paleosols were formed; (b) the middle sequence, composed largely by epiclastic sand occurring as barchanoid paleodunes; and (c) the upper sequence, con-sisting of massive, poorly bedded pyroclastic mudrocks (Bown et al. 1988; Bown and Larriestra 1990). The Pin-turas Formation differs from the Santa Cruz Formation in the greater volume of pyroclastic materials, absence of marine intercalations, and the presence of mature paleosols in the lower sequence (Bown and Larriestra 1990). | MACN | ||
| U.a. am Fundort ausgegraben: | Soriacebus ameghinorum | |||
| Sammlung | Epoche, Alter | Geologie, Formation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cerro de los Monos, Pinturas Fm., Lago Buenos Aires, Santa Cruz | Burdigalian zwischen 15.97 und 20.44 Millionen Jahren |
Pinturas | ||
| Kommentar z. Stratigraphie | Museum | |||
| Pertains to "Middle Sequence" = "Pinturan" of Kramarz & Bellosi 2005 | MACN | |||
| U.a. am Fundort ausgegraben: | Soriacebus adrianae | |||
| Sammlung | Epoche, Alter | Geologie, Formation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loma de la Lluvia, Pinturas Fm., Lago Buenos Aires | Burdigalian zwischen 15.97 und 20.44 Millionen Jahren |
Pinturas | ||
| Kommentar z. Stratigraphie | Lithographie | Museum | ||
| Pertains to "Middle Sequence" = "Pinturan" of Kramarz & Bellosi 2005 Brandoni et al 2016: The absolute ages of ca. 17.99 Ma near the base of the Pinturas Formation at Estancia el Carmen (47? 120 44.6400S, 70? 340 9700W), and ca. 16.8 Ma in the Santa Cruz For- mation that overlies the Pinturas Formation at Portezuelo Sumich Norte (see Perkins et al. 2012 and Fleagle et al. 2012) (Fig. 1b) indicate that the lower and middle sequences from the Pinturas Formation would be similar in age to those from the coastal localities of the Santa Cruz Formation (‘‘typical Santacrucian fauna’’) with ages of ca. 18–16 Ma (Bown and Fleagle 1993; Fleagle et al. 1995; Tejedor et al. 2006; Perkins et al. 2012), and younger than those from the lower Fossil Zone of the Colhue-Huapi Member of the Sarmiento Formation (‘‘Colhuehuapian fauna’’) (Kramarz et al. 2010) with ages of ca. 20.4–20.0 Ma (Re´ et al. 2010) or 21.11–18.62 Ma (Dunn et al. 2013) (Fig. 2). Brandoni et al 2016: in Loma de La Lluvia (47?10 47.0300S, 70? 4307.7200W; Fig. 1a, d), the fossils from the middle sequence that at this locality lies above a tephra level of ca.19.9 Ma, which is not a confident age, and the relationships of this level with others from Pinturas For- mation are still unclear (Perkins et al. 2012; Fleagle et al. 2012). | Brandoni et al 2016: The Pinturas Formation is composed of up to 100 m of Miocene continental pyroclastic and eolian epiclastic sed-iments outcropping in the upper valley of the Pinturas River and its tributaries (Fig. 1a). It lies unconformably atop the Jurassic La Matilde Formation (Bahı´a Laura River and its tributaries (Fig. 1a). It lies unconformably atop the Jurassic La Matilde Formation (Bahı´a Laura Group), and is divided by two intraformational erosional unconformities into three sequences: (a) the lower sequence, dominated by pyroclastic mudrocks upon which very mature paleosols were formed; (b) the middle sequence, composed largely by epiclastic sand occurring as barchanoid paleodunes; and (c) the upper sequence, con-sisting of massive, poorly bedded pyroclastic mudrocks (Bown et al. 1988; Bown and Larriestra 1990). The Pin-turas Formation differs from the Santa Cruz Formation in the greater volume of pyroclastic materials, absence of marine intercalations, and the presence of mature paleosols in the lower sequence (Bown and Larriestra 1990). | MACN | ||
| U.a. am Fundort ausgegraben: | Soriacebus adrianae | |||
| Sammlung | Epoche, Alter | Geologie, Formation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portezuelo Sumich Sur, Pinturas Fm., Lago Buenos Aires, Santa Cruz | Burdigalian zwischen 15.97 und 20.44 Millionen Jahren |
Pinturas | ||
| Kommentar z. Stratigraphie | Museum | |||
| Pertains to "Middle Sequence" = "Pinturan" of Kramarz & Bellosi 2005 | MACN | |||
| U.a. am Fundort ausgegraben: | Soriacebus adrianae | |||
| Sammlung | Epoche, Alter | Geologie, Formation | Kommentar zur Sammlung | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estancia Ana María, Pinturas Fm., Lago Buenos Aires | Burdigalian zwischen 15.97 und 20.44 Millionen Jahren |
Pinturas | Loma de las Ranas | |
| Kommentar z. Stratigraphie | Lithographie | Museum | ||
| Pertains to "Middle Sequence" = "Pinturan" of Kramarz & Bellosi 2005 Brandoni et al 2016: fossils come from the middle sequence that crops at the base of a pointed hill Brandoni et al 2016: The absolute ages of ca. 17.99 Ma near the base of the Pinturas Formation at Estancia el Carmen (47? 120 44.6400S, 70? 340 9700W), and ca. 16.8 Ma in the Santa Cruz For- mation that overlies the Pinturas Formation at Portezuelo Sumich Norte (see Perkins et al. 2012 and Fleagle et al. 2012) (Fig. 1b) indicate that the lower and middle sequences from the Pinturas Formation would be similar in age to those from the coastal localities of the Santa Cruz Formation (‘‘typical Santacrucian fauna’’) with ages of ca. 18–16 Ma (Bown and Fleagle 1993; Fleagle et al. 1995; Tejedor et al. 2006; Perkins et al. 2012), and younger than those from the lower Fossil Zone of the Colhue-Huapi Member of the Sarmiento Formation (‘‘Colhuehuapian fauna’’) (Kramarz et al. 2010) with ages of ca. 20.4–20.0 Ma (Re´ et al. 2010) or 21.11–18.62 Ma (Dunn et al. 2013) (Fig. 2). | Brandoni et al 2016: The Pinturas Formation is composed of up to 100 m of Miocene continental pyroclastic and eolian epiclastic sed-iments outcropping in the upper valley of the Pinturas River and its tributaries (Fig. 1a). It lies unconformably atop the Jurassic La Matilde Formation (Bahı´a Laura River and its tributaries (Fig. 1a). It lies unconformably atop the Jurassic La Matilde Formation (Bahı´a Laura Group), and is divided by two intraformational erosional unconformities into three sequences: (a) the lower sequence, dominated by pyroclastic mudrocks upon which very mature paleosols were formed; (b) the middle sequence, composed largely by epiclastic sand occurring as barchanoid paleodunes; and (c) the upper sequence, con-sisting of massive, poorly bedded pyroclastic mudrocks (Bown et al. 1988; Bown and Larriestra 1990). The Pin-turas Formation differs from the Santa Cruz Formation in the greater volume of pyroclastic materials, absence of marine intercalations, and the presence of mature paleosols in the lower sequence (Bown and Larriestra 1990). | MACN | ||
| U.a. am Fundort ausgegraben: | Soriacebus adrianae | |||
| Sammlung | Epoche, Alter | Geologie, Formation |
|---|---|---|
| El Carmen Lower, Pinturas Fm., Lago Buenos Aires, Santa Cruz | Burdigalian zwischen 15.97 und 20.44 Millionen Jahren |
Pinturas |
| Kommentar z. Stratigraphie | Museum | |
| Pertains to "Lower Sequence" = "Pinturan" of Kramaz and Bellosi, 2005 | MACN |
| Sammlung | Epoche, Alter | Geologie, Formation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loma de la Lluvia, Pinturas Fm., Lago Buenos Aires | Burdigalian zwischen 15.97 und 20.44 Millionen Jahren |
Pinturas | ||
| Kommentar z. Stratigraphie | Lithographie | Museum | ||
| Pertains to "Middle Sequence" = "Pinturan" of Kramarz & Bellosi 2005 Brandoni et al 2016: The absolute ages of ca. 17.99 Ma near the base of the Pinturas Formation at Estancia el Carmen (47? 120 44.6400S, 70? 340 9700W), and ca. 16.8 Ma in the Santa Cruz For- mation that overlies the Pinturas Formation at Portezuelo Sumich Norte (see Perkins et al. 2012 and Fleagle et al. 2012) (Fig. 1b) indicate that the lower and middle sequences from the Pinturas Formation would be similar in age to those from the coastal localities of the Santa Cruz Formation (‘‘typical Santacrucian fauna’’) with ages of ca. 18–16 Ma (Bown and Fleagle 1993; Fleagle et al. 1995; Tejedor et al. 2006; Perkins et al. 2012), and younger than those from the lower Fossil Zone of the Colhue-Huapi Member of the Sarmiento Formation (‘‘Colhuehuapian fauna’’) (Kramarz et al. 2010) with ages of ca. 20.4–20.0 Ma (Re´ et al. 2010) or 21.11–18.62 Ma (Dunn et al. 2013) (Fig. 2). Brandoni et al 2016: in Loma de La Lluvia (47?10 47.0300S, 70? 4307.7200W; Fig. 1a, d), the fossils from the middle sequence that at this locality lies above a tephra level of ca.19.9 Ma, which is not a confident age, and the relationships of this level with others from Pinturas For- mation are still unclear (Perkins et al. 2012; Fleagle et al. 2012). | Brandoni et al 2016: The Pinturas Formation is composed of up to 100 m of Miocene continental pyroclastic and eolian epiclastic sed-iments outcropping in the upper valley of the Pinturas River and its tributaries (Fig. 1a). It lies unconformably atop the Jurassic La Matilde Formation (Bahı´a Laura River and its tributaries (Fig. 1a). It lies unconformably atop the Jurassic La Matilde Formation (Bahı´a Laura Group), and is divided by two intraformational erosional unconformities into three sequences: (a) the lower sequence, dominated by pyroclastic mudrocks upon which very mature paleosols were formed; (b) the middle sequence, composed largely by epiclastic sand occurring as barchanoid paleodunes; and (c) the upper sequence, con-sisting of massive, poorly bedded pyroclastic mudrocks (Bown et al. 1988; Bown and Larriestra 1990). The Pin-turas Formation differs from the Santa Cruz Formation in the greater volume of pyroclastic materials, absence of marine intercalations, and the presence of mature paleosols in the lower sequence (Bown and Larriestra 1990). | MACN | ||
| U.a. am Fundort ausgegraben: | Soriacebus adrianae | |||
| Sammlung | Epoche, Alter | Geologie, Formation | Kommentar zur Sammlung | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estancia Ana María, Pinturas Fm., Lago Buenos Aires | Burdigalian zwischen 15.97 und 20.44 Millionen Jahren |
Pinturas | Loma de las Ranas | |
| Kommentar z. Stratigraphie | Lithographie | Museum | ||
| Pertains to "Middle Sequence" = "Pinturan" of Kramarz & Bellosi 2005 Brandoni et al 2016: fossils come from the middle sequence that crops at the base of a pointed hill Brandoni et al 2016: The absolute ages of ca. 17.99 Ma near the base of the Pinturas Formation at Estancia el Carmen (47? 120 44.6400S, 70? 340 9700W), and ca. 16.8 Ma in the Santa Cruz For- mation that overlies the Pinturas Formation at Portezuelo Sumich Norte (see Perkins et al. 2012 and Fleagle et al. 2012) (Fig. 1b) indicate that the lower and middle sequences from the Pinturas Formation would be similar in age to those from the coastal localities of the Santa Cruz Formation (‘‘typical Santacrucian fauna’’) with ages of ca. 18–16 Ma (Bown and Fleagle 1993; Fleagle et al. 1995; Tejedor et al. 2006; Perkins et al. 2012), and younger than those from the lower Fossil Zone of the Colhue-Huapi Member of the Sarmiento Formation (‘‘Colhuehuapian fauna’’) (Kramarz et al. 2010) with ages of ca. 20.4–20.0 Ma (Re´ et al. 2010) or 21.11–18.62 Ma (Dunn et al. 2013) (Fig. 2). | Brandoni et al 2016: The Pinturas Formation is composed of up to 100 m of Miocene continental pyroclastic and eolian epiclastic sed-iments outcropping in the upper valley of the Pinturas River and its tributaries (Fig. 1a). It lies unconformably atop the Jurassic La Matilde Formation (Bahı´a Laura River and its tributaries (Fig. 1a). It lies unconformably atop the Jurassic La Matilde Formation (Bahı´a Laura Group), and is divided by two intraformational erosional unconformities into three sequences: (a) the lower sequence, dominated by pyroclastic mudrocks upon which very mature paleosols were formed; (b) the middle sequence, composed largely by epiclastic sand occurring as barchanoid paleodunes; and (c) the upper sequence, con-sisting of massive, poorly bedded pyroclastic mudrocks (Bown et al. 1988; Bown and Larriestra 1990). The Pin-turas Formation differs from the Santa Cruz Formation in the greater volume of pyroclastic materials, absence of marine intercalations, and the presence of mature paleosols in the lower sequence (Bown and Larriestra 1990). | MACN | ||
| U.a. am Fundort ausgegraben: | Soriacebus adrianae | |||
Literatur
J. G. Fleagle 1990, New fossil platyrrhines from the Pinturas Formation, southern Argentina. Journal of Human Evolution. 19:1-2, p. 61 - 85, DOI: 10.1016/0047-2484(90)90012-Z,D. J. Meldrum 1990, New Fossil Platyrrhine Tali from the Early Miocene of Argentina. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 83:4, p. 403 - 418, DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330830402
M. F. Tejedor 2002, Primate canines from the early Miocene Pinturas Formation, Southern Argentina. Journal of Human Evolution. 43:1-2, p. 127 - 141, DOI: 10.1006/jhev.2002.0565
N. M. Novo, J. G. Fleagle 2015, New specimens of platyrrhine primates from Patagonia (Pinturas Formation, Early Miocene). Ameghiniana. 52:3, p. 367 - 372, DOI: 10.5710/AMGH.22.01.2015.2887
N. M. Novo, M. F. Tejedor, L. R. González-Ruiz, J. G. Fleagle, D. Brandoni, M. Krause 2021, Primate diversity in the early Miocene Pinturas Formation, southern Patagonia, Argentina. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências. 93:2, p. e20201218 - 372, DOI: 10.1590/0001-3765202120201218
